Michael McWhorter, known as TizzyEnt on TikTok, remarked on the silence. With 6.7 million followers, his true-crime content usually garners significant attention. He noted the lack of urgency from the online community, which contrasts with reactions to other violent incidents.
- Muted Online Response: True-crime TikToker Michael McWhorter (TizzyEnt) and other prominent internet sleuths have notably avoided involvement in the investigation of a CEO’s murder, raising questions about public priorities in high-profile cases.
- Mystery and Frustration: Cryptic messages on shell casings add intrigue to the case, while broader frustrations with the U.S. health care system may contribute to the public’s disinterest.
- Potential Backlash: Recent criticism faced by amateur detectives, such as Riley Walz, may discourage participation in online sleuthing.
- Wealth and Empathy Gap: Experts suggest that the victim’s status as a wealthy CEO might limit public sympathy, influencing the lack of urgency among digital investigators.
The masked gunman who shot Thompson remains unidentified. Shell casings at the crime scene had cryptic messages, adding to the mystery. Thompson’s family expressed their grief, describing him as a loving father and generous man. Despite these personal details, popular internet sleuths like Savannah Sparks and thatdaneshguy have chosen not to engage in this case.
Sparks, a health care professional with a large following, indicated her disinterest in aiding the investigation. Her community expressed cynicism towards traditional condolences, reflecting broader frustrations with the health care system. Similarly, thatdaneshguy criticized the industry, opting not to help identify the killer.
This reluctance among internet detectives coincides with growing dissatisfaction with U.S. health care. A recent Gallup poll revealed public sentiment at a 24-year low regarding health care quality. Such frustrations may contribute to the lack of online engagement.
While online sleuths have assisted in past investigations, such as identifying Capitol rioters, their absence in this case is notable. Some speculate that backlash against those attempting to help might deter others from stepping forward. For instance, Riley Walz faced criticism on social media after sharing potential leads with the police.
Experts like Sukrit Venkatagiri suggest that the public’s lack of empathy towards a wealthy CEO might explain the limited online activity. Despite the absence of sleuthing, the New York Police Department has released images of a “person of interest,” hoping to identify the suspect soon.
The police have offered a reward for information leading to an arrest. As the investigation unfolds, the unusual silence from internet sleuths remains a curious aspect of this high-profile case.
Be First to Comment